Birther Bumper Sticker

Update July 20, 2011 — Lucas Smith defends his Mombasa Obama certificate, mailed now to all members of the 111th and 112th Congresses.

Since before the 2008 election I have been involved in legal research on the Barack Hussein Obama Article II eligibility issue.

I’ve advised attorney Phil Berg and contributed to motions filed by Dr. Orly Taitz.

Prior to both the election and the January 9, 2009 Certification of Electoral Votes, I faxed and e-mailed seventy-seven Republican congressmen, including John McCain, advising them that ‘native-born’ was not synonymous with Article II’s ‘natural born citizen.’

The Internet publication of Obama’s Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth puzzled me, and I believe I was the first to discover the Hawaiian statutes, Haw. Stat. Rev. § 338-17.8 and 338-5 that permitted a Kenyan-born Obama, Jr. to have his birth registered in Hawaii.

Below is an image of unknown authenticity or attribution of a 17.8 Out-of-State registration, signed by Stanley Ann Dunham’s mother. Note the place of birth as an unknown hospital in Kenya.

This raises concerns about the Internet C.O.L.B., because it too should mention place of birth as Kenya.

Finally, see the Lucas Smith Mombasa Birth Certificate.

HRS 17.8 Out-of-State Registration signed by Madalyn Dunham

The Lucas Smith Mombasa Birth Certificate

The KOS C.O.L.B. naming Honolulu as Place of Birth


Tags: , , , , ,

15 Responses to “Birther Bumper Sticker”

  1. Granite Says:

    Re: The statute that you say ” permitted a Kenyan-born Obama, Jr. to have his birth registered in Hawaii.”

    In 1961, when Obama was born, there was no statute that allowed a foreign birth or even an out-of-state birth to be registered in Hawaii. Obama’s birth was registered in Hawaii, therefore he was born in Hawaii. And, even after that statue was passed, it did not allow any kind of birth document to be issued that said that someone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that she or he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s Certification, the current official birth certificate, says on it that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that fact was confirmed twice by the top officials in Hawaii. First they said that there is an original birth certificate in the files. Then they said that that document VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. Most recently the governor of Hawaii has also confirmed Obama’s birth in Hawaii, and there is this witness (

    The Kenya myth is laughable. First, it is a lie that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. The full transcript of the taped interview shows that she said repeatedly that he was born in Hawaii. And, in another interview, she said that the first that her family had heard of Obama’s birth was in a LETTER FROM HAWAII.

    If a person were born in Kenya, she or he would need a US travel document to get to the USA. That would be either a US visa on a foreign passport or the change to his mother’s US passport to include him. One or the other would have had to have been applied for at a US Consulate in Kenya and granted before the child would be allowed to enter the USA.

    If such a document existed, it would be easy to find because the records of the application for the visa or for the change to the mother’s passport would still be in the files of the US State Department, filed under applications for visas and applications for changes to passports in Kenya in 1961. The Republicans were in charge of the US State Department until January 2009. No such document has been found. No such document exists.

    Obama was not born in Kenya. He was born in Hawaii, as his official birth certificate from Hawaii shows, and the facts on it were repeatedly confirmed by the officials in Hawaii. Obama has already posted a copy of the official birth certificate, the Certification of Live Birth, which is the only birth document that Hawaii has been sending out since 2001. Hawaii no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate, only of the official birth certificate: The Certification of Live Birth.

    • paralegalnm Says:

      1) Lucas Smith speaks to his own defense as to accusations of forgery.
      2) I checked Hawaiian law in the law library, and those statutes I cited were valid then as now. In fact, all states have these registration provisions in their laws.
      3) There would be no visa application, only a Kenyan passport would be required for an infant. With a Kenyan birth certificate, Dunham could have gotten either a Kenyan or U.S. infant passport. As for discovering all these truths through production and verification, that has to be done through court order which has, to this date, been denied.
      4) Are you daft? Of course Hawaii, and every other state for that matter fulfills lawful requests for certified copies of the original documents. That report was erroneous . . . misinterpreted to boot.
      5) As for the Buffalo news article, that is double hearsay . . .

      Conclusion: In the end, while damning, Kenyan documentation is possible but not necessary to prove Obama is ineligible to the presidency. In fact, the C.O.L.B. alone is enough to damn him . . . and damned he will be . . . and sooner than you think.

  2. blessedistruth Says:

    I’ve just discovered you via ObamaConspiracy.

    Just wanted to introduce myself.

    The different “birther” camps do drive me a bit batty.

    And seem to be at odds with one another.

    Perhaps you’ve seen Sven’s comments at OC and at Free Republic.

    He could be spot on. I’ve asked him how can he be sure?

    How can you be sure?

    So many birther theories. They can’t ALL be true!

    BTW I love your photography. When I was a grad student at ASU I spent hours on end in a dark room.

    You lose sense of time in there. And I probably destroyed a lot of brain cells inhaling all of those chemicals.

    I hope to hear more from you and also see more of your work.


  3. rosettasister Says:


  4. Nate Farmer Says:

    Sven is spot on!

    His detractors routinely denigrate his theories based on available evidence by calling for more evidence that has been diligently sealed by Obama.

    Here’s an idea … let’s disprove Sven’s theories by unsealing Obama’s personal history and explaining his eligibility to the American people.

    Why can’t we see the original birth certificate?

    Why did Obama’s mother “strike” Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) from her 1968 US passport application? The fine print on the US DoS passport application states a person is to be identified and struck if they renounced their citizenship.

    Why can’t we see Obama’s SSA Form SS-5? Did he apply for a SSN as a US Citizen or a Permanent Resident?

    Why can’t we see Obama’s Occidental College transcript?

    Why is the administration offended when US citizens express concern the Constitution is being violated?

    Why do we have to triangulate to get to the answers concerning Barack’s eligibility, i.e. we can see available documents on Barack’s mother, but not a personal history of Barack?

  5. jtx Says:

    So many of the pro-O posters are really funny. It is hear to believe their thought processes are so shallow.

    One “new one” making the rounds is very entertaining now that the top-notch Petition for Writ of Certiorari is in front of SCOTUS from Mario Apuzzo in the form of the Kerchner et al v. Obama et al filing (availavble to download via scribd at

    The attempt at obfuscation goes something like this (endless permutations);

    “… if Obama is found ineligible and removed there will be wholesale rioting in the streets with massive killings by hundreds of thousands of angry voters who have had their votes overturned” (or similar nonsense). Most rational people can easily see any number of flies in that ointment – can you???

    • paralegalnm Says:

      The thinly veiled, if not up front threat of rioting has been going on since before the election. Even Obama was quoted in a speech insinuating rioting, or “quiet rioting,” whatever that is.

      I say, let them riot. A shotgun, the National Guard, a .357 magnum and a lever action rifle . . . the Tree of Liberty requires watering with the blood of Patriots, but moreso that of scoundrels who try to intimidate the Rule of Law with violence.

  6. Blue Hawaiian Says:

    The alleged “certificate of live birth” above has one major flaw. It cites HRS 338 -17.8. To the best of my knowledge, that statute had not yet been created in 1961.

    The territorial laws of Hawaii (specifically Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which were in effect in 1961) would have permitted Obama’s birth to be registered on the affirmation of any adult who would claim to have knowledge of the birth (i.e. his grandmother).

  7. paralegalnm Says:

    I checked Hawaiian law in the law library, and the HRS 338-17.8 and 338-5 statutes were in force.

    The out-of-state ‘certificate of birth’ looks correct. The ‘unknown, kenya’ place of birth is proper for a 17.8.

    My only concern is the similarity of the Dunham sig to that of Ericson, and the dates. Looks like the same handwriting.

    However, I do not presume authenticity of any of the posted documents. They are there as illustrations, for lack of the genuine article.

  8. Blue Hawaiian Says:

    Any chance that you could scan and post the relevant sections of Hawaiian Law that were in force on Augurst 4th, 1961? It would be a very helpful tool when trying to demonstrate that one of Obama’s relatives could have fraudulently claimed to witness his birth in Hawaii.

    • paralegalnm Says:

      The law you request is cited and quoted in my first blog on Obama from February 2009. Actually, every state has this particular statute . . . usually, the mother doesn’t commit perjury registering the infant . . . Of course, Obama may just have a Hawaiian birth certificate on file. Why he hasn’t released it, all it takes is $15 and a copy of his ID, convinces many it is not part of his Hawaiian vital records.

      As part of my due diligence, I made a quick trip to the law library, made a bee-line to the state statute stacks, and yanked out a copy of Hawaiian statute and codes . . . and checked the legislative notes on the law in question. It did apply in 1961.

  9. Blue Hawaiian Says:

    I was really looking for something that would permit me to prove that the law was in effect in 1961. While I might be willing to take your word, other won’t. No worries. I’ve got two execllent law libraries in town. I’ll make a trip sometime in the next week.

    I noticed that you mention the possibility of Obama’s mother filing a fraudulent birth report. I don’t think that would be possible if he was, in fact, born in Kenya. I don’t think his mother could have made it back to Hawaii on the 8th. For that reason I think it would have had to be one of his grandparents who would have possibly filed a false birth report. They probably claimed home birth.

    It also makes Grandma’s untimely death (the day before the election) suspicious…escpecially when you consider that releasing a birth report that may show her or her husband to have attested to the birth. It would definately raise some serious questions about the need to keep grandma quiet.

    As David Axelrod said; “the only people who want to keep things secret are folks who have something to hide”. :)

    • paralegalnm Says:

      Every state has a statutory provision for registering a newborn if the birth doesn’t take place in a licensed birthing facility. For example; a Navajo in New Mexico gets snowed in at her hogan. She gives birth and waits for the road to clear a week later. Then, she takes the newborn to a Dept. of Health clerk to register the child.

      It is possible that Dunham brought the infant back to the U.S. on either a U.S. or Kenyan passport. The newborn, only a few days old, could then be registered same as the Navajo child . . . the Hawaiian clerk must first contact all licensed birthing facilities to prevent double registration. If no record is found, it is compulsory that he registers the newborn to the Resident Hawaiian. You can see the possible risk of perjury.

      If you pull Hawaiian Statute in the Law Library state law section, you will easily find 338-5 and the notes on its revisions and other histories will be in small print just below the statute. It took me only a minute to pull the volume and check the statute.

  10. Joseph Guida MD Says:

    I am a retired anesthesiologist MD and have spent many years in delivery rooms where neonates are delivered, cared for, and their birth documented. I have NEVER witnessed a hospital birth occur without the subsequent filling out of a World Health Organization-approved long form birth certificate. My colleagues in medicine who have practiced the world over contend that long-form BIRTH CERTIFICATES with maternal, paternal, and neonate’s information are standards of documentary care the world over. Kenya does produce, and before and after independence did produce, long-forms even for home deliveries, provided a “clinician” (midwife or other responsible witness) was present and signed that form. Many times, there is a delay of a few days, but when born in the majority of countries, everyone, with virtually no exception, gets a long form birth record. There is no record of Dunham having delivered Obama in extremis…Sarah Obama has stated emphaticallly that BHO was born in Mombasa and that she was present (see any You Tube clip of this to verify her statement). Obama’s long-form is somewhere. The scoop amongst physicians within the Hawaii hospital system (I personally have heard from an old anesthesiologist acquaintance…one of my former residents…who worked in Lihue’s OR)…is that there is NOT A SCINTILLA OF A MEDICAL RECORD OF AN OBAMA HAWAIIAN BIRTH. The medical records clerks in all of Hawaii’s hospitals have searched! Former State Clerk Tim Adams has stated this via affidavit as well If the delivery occurred in a hospital, as Obama contends his did, that hospital and jurisdiction, by statute, maintain a copy of that record, with a signature of the attending obstetrician/midwife, and a black ink footprint of the neonate. The strong circumstantial evidence thus far seems to indicate that Obama was not born in Hawaii and as such, is a liar.

    Every lawyer in DC and every physician in this country…without a pro-Obama agenda….knows that Obama is NOT eligible to hold the office of president of the United States. As indicated within this blog-owner’s erudite notes above, this evidence MUST BE INCLUDED in any legal motion to derail the Obamacare debacle as well as every other anti-capitalist piece of legislation. It is Obama’s weakest link (actually it’s a non-existent link) and will force the reversal of every pseudo-presidential action Obama dared to take as the usurper-in-chief. I remain amazed at the ridiculous efforts made by the left to support Obama’s presidency. The circular logic being used to bolster the fraudulent COLB is unbelievable. Our Judiciary, our Congress and the Electoral College have collectively and individually dishonored themselves and sloughed off the Constitution for the sake of creating the ultimate “reparation.”

    • paralegalnm Says:

      An excellent comment, sir.

      It is interesting how your professional language transitions mid-comment to that of an angry and frustrated citizen.

      As for ‘reparations,’ that is the bitterest of ironies, for it is reasonable to deduce that Obama’s Muslim ancestors were active conspirators in the East African coastal slave trade, for the Arabs.

      Please fax or write your congressmen. Your opinion is both succinct and valid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: