Dear Rep. McCotter,
January of 2009, you replied to my fax/e-mail to 77 Republican congressmen, begging just two of them, as required by Title 3 § 15, to submit a single-page letter to the President of the Senate challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s Electoral Votes based on his Article II eligibility, vis-à-vis Sen. McCain in SR511, and Minor vs. Happersett (1874).
Don’t you wish now that two congressmen had listened?
J. Waite in Minor followed the constitution and existing legislated act when he determined the citizenship of Ms. Minor under the following parameters:
Additions might always be made to the citizenship of the United States in two ways: first, by birth, and second, by naturalization. This is apparent from the Constitution itself, for it provides that “no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,” and that Congress shall have power “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.” Thus new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization.
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
Yet, 24 years later, J. Gray in Wong Kim Ark set aside the Article I, Sec. 8 plenary power of congress and ignored the legislative history of the 14th Amendment, vis-a’-vis the 1866 Civil Rights Act, to re-establish the ancient feudal tradition of English jus soli as constitutional law itself, arrogating by Article III power over that rightfully of congress, and congressional intent in writing the Reconstruction Acts in the first place!
In addition, J. Gray violated Sec. 5 of the 14th Amendment itself:
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
J. Gray ignored the brief submitted by the United States solicitor ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/23965360/Wong-Kim-Ark-US-v-169-US-649-1898-Appellants-Brief-USA ) that followed existing law, instead creating his own law in direct conflict with U.S. Uniform Naturalization Act, acts which consistently followed the jus sanguinis model since first inception in March, 1790.
While the colonial states, under England, were forced to follow jus soli (See The Case of Mr. Smith) https://paraleaglenm.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/the-first-eligibility-case-1789/ ; ten months later, the 1790 Act superseded English common law and statutes and relied upon jus sanginis. (Cf. Shanks, vs. DuPont, 28 U.S. 242; 7 L. Ed. 666; 1830 U.S. LEXIS 537)
Conflicts of Law, by way of Wong Kim Ark, have created the illegal immigration problem bankrupting municipalities and hospital systems, and diluting the electorate with illegal voters to such a degree that New Mexico admits that the number of illegal alien voters has reached 10% of the vote, enough to undermine any election.
In addition, the confusion created by Ark has conflated the term ‘native born’ citizen with ‘natural born,’ resulting in the election of an avowed Marxist to the presidency, whose father was an alien from a British Colonial Protectorate, the Kenyan Colony . . . an extremist Marxist and Muslim himself . . . a person of values and purpose in direct conflict with our U.S. constitution.
Can you imagine what John Jay would say to that?
Exigency: by definition is a condition of imminent harm that is so serious that it allows constitutional rights to be suspended.
Look at our economy: Barack Obama is out-spending FDR, and pushing through unconstitutional bills and legal actions against states, corporations and private citizens. If not for the unemployment checks, there would be Depression Era soup lines. Obama has blocked domestic energy production, telling citizens complaining about gas prices to, and I quote, “Get used to it!” Yet, where are our four Schecter Brothers? Perhaps their names are Berg, Apuzzo, Donofrio, and Taitz?
The United States is facing imminent harm, citizens losing their homes and jobs and families right now.
The Stimulus Plan was not intended to create or save jobs, but to hide the damage being done to the economy and dollar until the Republicans take back the presidency, just in time for the entire system to collapse . . . on their watch , so to speak.
August 2, 2011 approaches with no pragmatic solutions to our National Debt, and a president who refuses to follow constitutional requirements of a formal budget and accounting.
See letters from Representatives Burges (R-TX) and McCotter (R-MI) at https://paraleaglenm.wordpress.com/2011/01/07/who-is-a-citizen-at-birth-or-a-natural-born-citizen/
Other important blogs: